MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Marius Copil [706th] vs Dominic Stricker [258th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Copil 1 - 1 Stricker

They have played 5 sets in total, with Copil winning 2 and Stricker winning 3. The last match between Copil and Stricker was at the Biel Challenger, 23-03-2023, Second, I.hard with Marius Copil getting the victory 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Marius Copil 1
Dominic Stricker 1
Copil vs Stricker H2H Profile
Copil Stats Stricker
0% (0-0) YTD Win/Loss 53% (10-9)
1 Head-to-Head 1
706 Ranking 258
56 Highest Rank 88
34 Age 22
R Plays -
8 Titles 5
54% (508-429) Career Total W/L 57% (129-99)
$1,305,320 Career Prize Money $609,765
1 Indoor H2H 1

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Copil VS Stricker H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
3-6 6-2 7-6(3)
cross
Marius Copil
Player
Dominic Stricker
60% ( 56 of 94)
1st Serve %
69% ( 65 of 94)
21
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
75% ( 42 of 56)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 47 of 65)
55% ( 21 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
33% ( 31 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 35 of 94)
98
Total Points Won
90
7-6(3) 6-2
cross
Dominic Stricker
Player
Marius Copil
58% ( 37 of 64)
1st Serve %
51% ( 32 of 63)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
78% ( 29 of 37)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 25 of 32)
52% ( 14 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 10 of 31)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
33% ( 21 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 28 of 63)
71
Total Points Won
56

Copil VS Stricker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Copil Vs Stricker H2H Stats
Marius Copil Copil Stats Dominic Stricker Stricker
1 H2H Matches 1
2 Sets Won 3
24 Games Won 27
30 Aces (Total) 17
4 Total Double Faults 8
1:31:32 Average Match Time 1:31:32
56% (88/157) 1st Serve % 65% (102/158)
76% (67/88) 1st Serve Win % 75% (76/102)
45% (31/69) 2nd Serve Win % 46% (26/56)
42% (5/12) Break Points Won % (Total) 55% (6/11)
35% (56/158) Return Points Win % 38% (59/157)
50% (1/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 50% (1/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
50% (1/2) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 50% (1/2)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Won Match 50% (2/1)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 50% (2/1)
50% (2/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Marius Copil vs Dominic Stricker Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Copil 1 - 1 Stricker

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Copil has won 41.89% of points on their second serve, while Stricker has won 43.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Copil, in recent form, has won 59.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stricker has won 43.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25% and 23.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Copil has saved 40% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stricker has saved 48.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Copil has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 3), with Stricker winning 47.83% (W/L 22/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 151/ 166). Stricker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 55/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 17/ 19).
  • Player level: In the last year, Copil has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Stricker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.47% of matches (W/L 13/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Copil winning 1 times and Stricker being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Copil winning 2 and Stricker winning 3. The last match between Copil and Stricker was at the Biel Challenger, 23-03-2023, Second, I.hard with Marius Copil getting the victory 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:32.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Copil and Stricker have played a deciding set 1 times, with Copil winning 1 times and Stricker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Copil winning 1, and Stricker 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Copil has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.33 while Stricker has played against players with an average rank of 253.11.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Copil has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stricker has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Copil has converted 66.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stricker has converted 29.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Marius Copil Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Remy Bertola
    Player
    Marius Copil
    58% ( 42 of 73)
    1st Serve %
    47% ( 32 of 68)
    4
    Aces
    5
    5
    Double Faults
    6
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 19 of 32)
    35% ( 11 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 15 of 36)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    41% ( 30 of 73)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 34 of 68)
    77
    Total Points Won
    64
    L
    6-3 7-6(8) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Remy Bertola
    Player
    Marius Copil
    60% ( 46 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    50% ( 38 of 76)
    7
    Aces
    5
    6
    Double Faults
    5
    74% ( 34 of 46)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 27 of 38)
    45% ( 14 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 16 of 38)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    38% ( 29 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 33 of 76)
    81
    Total Points Won
    72
    L
    6-2 2-6 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Ryan Nijboer
    Player
    Marius Copil
    71% ( 42 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 38 of 64)
    1
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 26 of 38)
    65% ( 11 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 12 of 26)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    27% ( 16 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 26 of 64)
    69
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Benjamin Bonzi
    Player
    Marius Copil
    67% ( 36 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 33 of 63)
    3
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    81% ( 29 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 21 of 33)
    44% ( 8 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 11 of 30)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    31% ( 17 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 31 of 63)
    68
    Total Points Won
    49
    L
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Sergi Perez Contri
    Player
    Marius Copil
    74% ( 52 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 30 of 53)
    2
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    69% ( 36 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 22 of 30)
    50% ( 9 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 6)
    36% ( 25 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 20 of 53)
    65
    Total Points Won
    58
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Damir Dzumhur
    Player
    Marius Copil
    74% ( 45 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 29 of 49)
    0
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    62% ( 28 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 17 of 29)
    63% ( 10 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    38% ( 23 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 23 of 49)
    61
    Total Points Won
    49
    L
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Arthur Gea
    Player
    Marius Copil
    68% ( 47 of 69)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 37 of 62)
    9
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    72% ( 34 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 27 of 37)
    59% ( 13 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 10 of 25)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 5)
    32% ( 22 of 69)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 25 of 62)
    72
    Total Points Won
    59
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Arthur Bouquier
    Player
    Marius Copil
    62% ( 39 of 63)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 42 of 65)
    10
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    0
    87% ( 34 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 31 of 42)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    25% ( 16 of 63)
    Rtn Points Won
    32% ( 21 of 65)
    68
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    6-4 7-6(3) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Lucas Poullain
    Player
    Marius Copil
    66% ( 41 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 37 of 61)
    0
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    80% ( 33 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 25 of 37)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 8 of 24)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    31% ( 19 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 28 of 61)
    71
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    Rubber 1
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H

    Dominic Stricker Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Max Houkes
    Player
    Dominic Stricker
    63% ( 55 of 87)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 38 of 75)
    1
    Aces
    5
    7
    Double Faults
    3
    71% ( 39 of 55)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    44% ( 14 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 17 of 37)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 3 of 12)
    39% ( 34 of 87)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 33 of 75)
    86
    Total Points Won
    76
    L
    7-5 7-6(3) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Niccolo Catini
    46% ( 19 of 41)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 43 of 68)
    5
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    89% ( 17 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 23 of 43)
    59% ( 13 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 11 of 25)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    27% ( 11 of 41)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 34 of 68)
    64
    Total Points Won
    45
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Winner Okey
    41% ( 13 of 32)
    1st Serve %
    32% ( 12 of 37)
    0
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    77% ( 10 of 13)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 7 of 12)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 10 of 25)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    28% ( 9 of 32)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 20 of 37)
    43
    Total Points Won
    26
    W
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    F
    cross
    Max Houkes
    Player
    Dominic Stricker
    63% ( 44 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 30 of 66)
    3
    Aces
    2
    7
    Double Faults
    4
    64% ( 28 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    31% ( 8 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 14 of 36)
    35% ( 6 of 17)
    Break Points Won
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    49% ( 34 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 37 of 66)
    73
    Total Points Won
    63
    L
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Gianmarco Ferrari
    42% ( 28 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 50 of 82)
    5
    Aces
    2
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    64% ( 18 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 31 of 50)
    62% ( 24 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    31% ( 10 of 32)
    40% ( 6 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    37% ( 25 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 41 of 82)
    83
    Total Points Won
    66
    W
    6-1 3-6 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Laurent Lokoli
    56% ( 32 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 33 of 54)
    3
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    69% ( 22 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    56% ( 14 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    37% ( 21 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 26 of 54)
    62
    Total Points Won
    49
    W
    7-5 6-0 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Pietro Orlando Fellin
    44% ( 27 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 39 of 59)
    1
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    78% ( 21 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    49% ( 19 of 39)
    43% ( 15 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 8 of 20)
    55% ( 6 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    42% ( 26 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 32 of 59)
    68
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Paolo Schiavone
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 19 of 33)
    3
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    93% ( 14 of 15)
    1st Serve Won
    42% ( 8 of 19)
    77% ( 10 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    7% ( 1 of 14)
    67% ( 6 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    14% ( 4 of 28)
    Rtn Points Won
    73% ( 24 of 33)
    48
    Total Points Won
    13
    W
    6-1 6-0 H2H
    F
    cross
    Daniil Glinka
    Player
    Dominic Stricker
    66% ( 35 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 35 of 53)
    2
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    86% ( 30 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 20 of 35)
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 8 of 18)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    30% ( 16 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 25 of 53)
    62
    Total Points Won
    44
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Dominic Stricker
    Player
    Ben Jones
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 24 of 34)
    0
    Aces
    6
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    76% ( 13 of 17)
    1st Serve Won
    83% ( 20 of 24)
    64% ( 14 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    31% ( 12 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    24% ( 8 of 34)
    35
    Total Points Won
    38
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Copil & Stricker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Marius Copil Copil Stats Dominic Stricker Stricker
    54% (508/429) Win/Loss 57% (129/99)
    53% (1182/1033) Sets Win/Loss 55% (307/255)
    51% (11371/10901) Games Win/Loss 51% (2796/2652)
    0.62 Aces Per Game 0.64
    6741 Aces Total 1709
    0.19 Double Faults Per Game 0.27
    2098 Total Double Faults 717
    1:10:55 Average Match Time 1:36:39
    535.95 Average Opponent Rank 324.1
    59% (30669/52322) 1st Serve % 57% (9249/16366)
    76% (23337/30669) 1st Serve Win % 75% (6911/9249)
    53% (11393/21653) 2nd Serve Win % 51% (3662/7117)
    37% (1431/3829) Break Points Won % (Total) 39% (567/1465)
    35% (18063/52250) Return Points Win % 37% (6316/16977)
    55% (492/897) Best of 3 Sets Win % 58% (117/203)
    41% (11/27) Best of 5 Sets Win % 53% (10/19)
    52% (238/454) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 55% (62/112)
    51% (162/316) Deciding Set Win % 56% (46/82)
    83% (511/424) 1st Set Won, Won Match 84% (123/103)
    17% (511/87) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (123/18)
    19% (426/81) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 25% (105/26)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    17:30
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    Gwangju Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...